![]() ![]() The Antarctic ice sheet is much larger than the Arctic ice sheet. The NASA study contradicted the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2013 report, which stated: “Over the last two decades, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been losing mass, glaciers have continued to shrink almost worldwide, and Arctic sea ice and Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover have continued to decrease in extent (high confidence).”įollowing the NASA study and further research, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reversed its position on Antarctic ice coverage. That included a net gain of 82 billion tons of ice per year between 20. NASA published a study in 2015 that showed that the Antarctic ice sheet had gained billions of tons of ice each year for decades. Notably, the Antarctic ice sheet does not have a shrinking trend, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2021 report. The Antarctic ice sheet does not generate the same headlines. In March of 2018, MSNBC published an article on the semi-annual update titled: “How vanishing Arctic ice may set stage for extreme Nor’easters.”įor 2020’s second update, Vox published this headline: “Why the record low Arctic sea ice this October is so alarming.” The March 2017 news of the Arctic ice sheet’s greatest extent garnered this headline in the Washington Post: “The Arctic just set a grim new record for low levels of sea ice.” On the same day last year, that the New York Times reported the annual low range of the Arctic ice cap in the print edition, the top story in the print edition read: “A Climate Crossroads With 2 Paths: Merely Bad or Truly Horrific.”Įvery year in March and September, the Arctic ice’s annual highs and lows generate grave warnings and calls to action across media outlets (sometimes accompanied by pictures of sad polar bears on precarious floating ice). The decreasing trend in the north pole’s ice cap has been one of the biggest headline generators in climate change news coverage. The past 15 years have shown a lower extent of Arctic ice coverage compared to the previous 27 years. Scientists have tracked ice coverage in the Arctic since 1979. ![]() He added that this year is a “reprieve” and that “the weather is so variable.” “The extent is higher than in recent years, but that is not telling the full story,” explained Mark Serreze, executive director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center. Upon news of the greater ice coverage, scientists noted that weather patterns fluctuate and pointed to a zone of colder-than-usual air pressure over the Beaufort Sea. Scientists maintain that the northerly polar ice cap continues on a downward melting trend. This year’s post-melting season ice sheet is 40 percent larger than the record low, which was set in 2012. "It was ammonia, and you know what that can do.Scientists at the National Snow and Ice Data Center announced Wednesday that the Arctic ice sheet extends 25 percent further than it did last summer, with 1.82 million square miles of ice at its annual low.Īrctic ice coverage reaches its lowest extent in mid- to late-September following the melting season. He says he and his co-workers were told to evacuate as quickly as possible but weren't told how long they should stay away. ![]() He said the smoke rose about 30 metres and was blown east. "Crews learned once they got on scene that it was actually a cloud of ammonia that had escaped a bottle from the facility within the building," Cail told CBC News.Ĭhris Leader, who works about 200 metres away from the site of the leak, was having lunch in his truck when he says he heard a "pop" and saw a "great big" plume of smoke coming out of the Arctic Glacier Ice building. The industrial park is north of downtown Kamloops, on the other side of the South Thompson River.Ĭail says crews didn't realize they were dealing with ammonia until they arrived to find a strong smell in the air. (Jenifer Norwell/CBC)Ī hazmat team with Kamloops Fire Rescue responded to the leak, as did WorkSafeBC. Chris Leader says he heard a "pop" followed by a plume of smoke coming from the building where the ammonia leak originated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |